The ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter, about 3.14159.

Enter either a circumference or a diameter. The calculator is sensitive to the precision of the measurement. If you want more decimal places in the answer, add trailing zeroes to your entry to indicate a more precise measurement.

According to Cajori, the symbol π was first used for this number in 1706¹, but its widespread acceptance is due to Leonard Euler’s adopting it in 1736.

3.141 592 653 589 793 238 462 643 383 279 502 884 197 169 399 375 105 820 974 944 592 307 816 406 286 208 998 628 034 825 342 117 067 982 148 086 513 282 306 647 093 844 609 550 582 231 725 359 408 128 481 117 450 284 102 701 938 521 105 559 644 622 948 954 930 381 964 428 810 975 665 933 446 128 475 648 233 786 783 165 271 201 909 1..... It goes on forever.

A mnenomic for the first 15 digits of pi (count the letters in each word) is “How I like a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.”²

In July 1997, Yasumasa Kanada and colleagues at the University of Tokyo Computer Centre announced that they had calculated pi to 51,539,600,000 decimal places. Actually, the number was calculated twice, by two different machines using different software, and the results compared as a check on accuracy. It took one machine 29 hours and the other 37.

Pi to many, many digits can be downloaded from a number of Web sites, formerly at Kanada’s own to 4,200,000,000 decimal digits. Fewer digits but more accessible is Simon Fraser University’s:

www.cecm.sfu.ca/organics/papers/borwein/paper/html/local/billdigits.html.

In everyday life calculations involving pi have used a fractional approximation:

Value | Used where? |
---|---|

^{25}⁄_{8} |
Babylon |

Ancient Egypt | |

between ^{223}⁄_{71} and ^{22}⁄_{7} |
Archimedes |

^{377}⁄_{120} |
Ptolemy, about 160 |

India | |

^{864}⁄_{275} |
Fibonacci, 1220 |

Even our decimals, to however many places, are really decimal fractions. These approximations are convenient, but in 1766 Lambert proved that pi cannot be expressed as the ratio between two whole numbers. This property makes it an irrational number, like the square root of two.

Some irrational numbers, such as the square root of two, can be the root of an algebraic equation (one like “ax² + bx + c = 0”; the square root of two is a root of x² - 2 = 0). Pi cannot, and that property makes it a transcendental number.

1. In:

William Jones.

*Synopsis palmariorum matheseos.*

London, 1706.

Page 263.

2. C. B. Boyer.

*A History of Mathematics.*

New York: Wiley, 1968.

A nice collection of links is David Blattner's www.joyofpi.com.

Petr Beckmann.

*The History of Pi.*

Boulder, CO: The Golem Press, 1971.

Reprinted by St. Martins Press, 1976. Opinionated and delightful.

David Blattner

*The Joy of Pi.*

New York: Walker and Co., 1997.

Alfred S. Posamentier and Ingmar Lehman.

π: * A Biography of the World's Most Mysterious Number.*

Prometheus Books, 2004.

Y. E. O. Adrian.

*The Pleasures of Pi,e.*

World Scientific, 2007.

Tamar Friedmann and C.R. Hagen.

Quantum mechanical derivation of the Wallis formula for pi.

*Journal of Mathematical Physics*, November 10, 2015.

doi:10.1063/1.4930800

www.numberworld.org/misc_runs/pi-5t/details.html

X

Sorry. No information on contributors is available for this page.

Copyright © 2000-2017 Sizes, Inc. All rights reserved.

Last revised: 16 September 2017.